Unweaving the Rainbow

It’s such a tough meme to kill.  Why are people so committed to the proposition that intensive and comprehensive study (or even not so intensive and comprehensive study) somehow ruins one’s ability to appreciate a given phenomenon?  I’m sure it’s in no small part a rationalization of laziness and/or lack of perceptive capabilities.

Those active in the scientific fields have done a pretty good job of quashing this meme in their own context.  Students of biology, medicine, physics, etc are generally students of biology, medicine, physics, etc because they are excited to learn about the phenomena pursuant to those fields; they believe better understanding leads to greater appreciation.  They don’t undertake their studies simply to observe phenomena and then not study them.

The situation in the arts is a curious one.  This being Musical Beef, I’ll concentrate on musical art.  Most professional musicians have gone to school to study music.  Institutions devoted to the study of music are out there.  It’s often expected that a candidate for a job in the musical field hold degrees in the relevant area of musical study.  Yet the very same people who expect a professional musician to hold music degrees, and would even drag out their own degrees from prestigious conservatories in order to boast, are constantly prattling about how trying to explain music to others (or even to yourself) ruins the listening experience.  Nonsense.  What I think the author of the popular blog Proper Discord was trying to say was that there is a time and place for musical study, and actually during the concert is not it.

Don’t get me wrong.  My first and best test for musical greatness remains the “goosebump test.”  Concerning the uninitiated’s concert experiences, Proper Discord writes: “they enjoyed the good stuff, and didn’t enjoy the bad stuff.”  I share the view that music can be appreciated without knowing much about it.  Indeed, music’s effect on the limbic system (and more specifically the sympathetic nervous system – why we get goosebumps!) isn’t dependant on a full understanding of various compositional techniques.  I just don’t think getting to know more about the music diminishes one’s appreciation of it.

Proper Discord closes with a quote from Georges Braque: “There is only one valuable thing in art: the thing you cannot explain.”  Oh, boy.  Postmodern deepity time.  If you can’t explain it, how do you know it’s any good?  Or completely awful?  If someone comes to me proclaiming the greatness of this or that, I want them to be able to give me at least SOME kind of a rationale, just as I always feel obliged to explain why I think something is great.  And you certainly shouldn’t pronounce negatively on something without being able to explain what the problems are.   “Just because,” or “de gustibus non est disputandum” only gets us to the postmodern quagmire where, since everything is great, nothing winds up being great.

This, however, I couldn’t agree with more:

A lot of the time, though, we rationalise what we like after we’ve decided that we like it.

Unfortunately, I think this is how quite a lot of music finds its way into the canon.

PS:  The video at the bottom of the article is not the first time Proper Discord has compared music with food.  I don’t think the analogy is apt (although I have to admit that post is mostly pretty clever and funny).  We’ve evolved to crave the once-rare fats and sugars now found in junk food.  That’s why it’s so satisfying to indulge.  Our inner-caveman is unaware that sensible portions of healthy food are in plentiful and immediately available supply.  Is there a similarly self-preserving genetic directive compelling us to indulge in “cheesy pop music”?  I don’t think so.

3 Responses to “Unweaving the Rainbow”

  1. 1 properdiscord
    April 30, 2011 at 6:21 pm

    It seems that you’re mostly arguing with things I didn’t say, which is fine, but I’d like to point out two things:

    1) I didn’t simply assert that learning about music might not always improve one’s enjoyment of it. I linked to a study that had found exactly that. The way to refute my argument is to find fault with that study, not to simply dismiss what I’m saying as “prattle”

    2) The suggestion that “trying to explain music to others ruins the listening experience” is a straw man. It can be counterproductive to tell people that they need to know about music before they can possibly enjoy it. That’s a totally different argument.

    • April 30, 2011 at 10:19 pm

      “Prattling” was an unfair characterization. I usually try to be more circumspect with my word choice. I apologize for that. I think I got the sense you were in fact saying those things mostly from the two quotes near the end. I don’t like those quotes. Beecham’s is itself an unfair, glib generalization; and I don’t see how the Braque actually means anything. They both make it sound as if the point being made was “follow your heart, not your head.”

      • 3 properdiscord
        May 1, 2011 at 6:36 am

        Supporting quotes are easily misused as a way to add rhetorical weight to bad ideas and empty assertions. Most of the time, the only thing they tell us is that somebody else already had an idea like this. That is their function here.

        The argument is structured thus:

        Here is an anecdote that illustrates how I came to notice something*.

        Here are some stories that show it is plausible, if perhaps counterintuitive.

        Here are two quotes illustrating that this is hardly a new idea among the artists themselves.

        Here is the conclusion, which says what I think we should do about this stuff if it is indeed true.

        * Here is a footnote linking to a study showing something similar has been observed under controlled conditions.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

April 2011

%d bloggers like this: